Aguilera v. Donnelly

Second Circuit

Aguilera v. Donnelly

111 F. App'x 649

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 12, 2004

DocketNo. 03-0177-PR

StatusPublished

This text of 111 F. App'x 649 (Aguilera v. Donnelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aguilera v. Donnelly, 111 F. App'x 649 (2d Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Jesús Aguilera, pro se, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New [650]*650York (Schroeder, M.J.), granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants in Aguilera’s civil rights complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts.

Upon review of the record and the applicable law', we affirm largely for the reasons stated by the District Court, although we note that the record before us does not folly explain why almost three years passed before the plaintiff could be transferred from involuntary protective custody at one institution to the general population at another institution. In addition, we decline to address claims not raised before the District Court.

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Jesús Aguilera, pro se, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New [650]*650York (Schroeder, M.J.), granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants in Aguilera’s civil rights complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts.

Upon review of the record and the applicable law', we affirm largely for the reasons stated by the District Court, although we note that the record before us does not folly explain why almost three years passed before the plaintiff could be transferred from involuntary protective custody at one institution to the general population at another institution. In addition, we decline to address claims not raised before the District Court.

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 F. App'x 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aguilera-v-donnelly-ca2-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack