Aguilar v. The Neil Jones Food Company

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedMarch 25, 2024
Docket1:23-cv-01624
StatusUnknown

This text of Aguilar v. The Neil Jones Food Company (Aguilar v. The Neil Jones Food Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aguilar v. The Neil Jones Food Company, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Opinion

1 MICHAEL E. WILBUR (State Bar No. 152361) AFRICA E. DAVIDSON (State Bar No. 225680) 2 APEX EMPLOYMENT LAW, LLP 1970 Broadway, Suite 850 3 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 588-1310 4 Email: mwilbur@apexemploymentlaw.com 5 adavidson@apexemploymentlaw.com

6 Attorneys for Defendant THE NEIL JONES FOOD COMPANY 7

8 SANG (JAMES) PARK, (State Bar No. 232956) sang@park-lawyers.com 9 PARK APC 8383 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 800 10 Beverly Hills, California 90211 Telephone: (310) 627-2964 11 Fax: (310) 362-8279

12 Attorneys for Plaintiff JUAN JOSE ANDRADE AGUILAR 13

14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 FRESNO DIVISION 17

18 JUAN JOSE ANDRADE AGUILAR, Case No. 1:23-cv-01624-KES-BAM

19 Plaintiff, STIPULATION RE [PROPOSED] 20 vs. PROTECTIVE ORDER

21 THE NEIL JONES FOOD COMPANY; and Action Filed: September 15, 2023 22 DOES 1 to 10, Trial Date: March 31, 2026

23 Defendant.

27 1 WHEREAS the parties in this action pending in the United States District Court, 2 Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:23-cv-01624-KES-BAM (“the Litigation”), anticipate that 3 during the course of the Litigation documents and/or information of a sensitive, private, and 4 confidential nature may be produced in the course of discovery or otherwise disclosed or provided, 5 and the parties wish to protect the confidentiality of such documents or information while ensuring 6 that discovery may be pursued with a minimum of delay and expense; 7 THEREFORE Plaintiff Juan Jose Andrade Aguilar and Defendant The Neil Jones Food 8 Company (hereafter “Party or Parties”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby 9 stipulate and agree as follows, and request entry of this proposed protective order consistent with the 10 following terms: 11 1. Confidential Information”: For purposes of this Order, “Confidential Information” is 12 any type or classification of information that is designated as “Confidential” by any party, whether it 13 be a document, information contained in a document, information revealed during a deposition, 14 information revealed in an interrogatory answer, response to request for admission, or otherwise, that 15 a party in good faith seeks to protect from disclosure or to make subject to only limited disclosure 16 during the Litigation to protect legitimate business interests, the privacy rights of third-persons, or 17 for any other reason, whether or not such information is expressly protected by state or federal law. 18 Confidential Information includes, but is not limited to, the following: 19 (a) Protected Health Information (“PHI”), as defined by California Evidence 20 Code § 1157 and/or California Health and Safety Code §§ 1370 and 1370.1 and/or the California 21 Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, Civil Code § 56, et seq.; 22 (b) Personnel and employee information (including without limitation the 23 addresses, email addresses, and telephone numbers of present or former employees of Defendant, not 24 including that of Plaintiff; 25 (c) Information the disclosure of which would potentially impair the competitive 26 position of Defendant; 27 (d) Other financial and business information not available to the public; 1 (e) Information relating to the organizational structure of Defendant; and 2 (f) Information relating to the clients of Defendant, including such clients’ 3 personal identifying information or personal health information. 4 1. Scope of Order: The protections of the Order may be invoked with respect to the 5 originals or copies of any documents, oral testimony, notes, data, information, summaries, extracts, 6 or things (collectively, “materials”) produced, created, or given in the Litigation in any form which 7 contain Confidential Information. 8 2. Designation of Materials Containing Confidential Information: A party may 9 designate materials as “Confidential” for purposes of this Order in the following manner: 10 (a) Documents (apart from depositions or other pretrial testimony): the legend 11 “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be affixed on the pages containing any Confidential Information at the 12 time such documents are produced, or as soon thereafter as the party seeking protection becomes 13 aware of the confidential nature of the information disclosed and can reasonably make such a 14 designation, except as otherwise agreed upon by the Parties. The Parties may also retroactively 15 designate information or materials that were disclosed or produced prior to entry of a protective 16 order, provided that such designation is made within thirty (30) days of entry of such an order in 17 those instances in which the party is already aware of the confidential nature of the information 18 disclosed or, if not, as soon thereafter as the party seeking protection becomes aware of the 19 confidential nature of the information disclosed and can reasonably make such a designation, except 20 as otherwise agreed upon by the Parties. 21 (b) Depositions Or Other Pretrial Testimony: Witness testimony may be 22 designated as Confidential Information as follows: (i) the designating party, through counsel, may 23 make a statement on the record during such deposition or other pretrial proceeding that the entire 24 transcript or a portion thereof shall be designated as Confidential; or (ii) by counsel’s written notice 25 of such designation sent to counsel for all other parties within thirty (30) days after receipt of the 26 deposition transcript or within thirty (30) days after the entry of a protective order, whichever occurs 27 later. Upon being informed that certain portions of a deposition disclose Confidential Information, 1 the court reporter shall separately bind the appropriate pages and stamp “Confidential” on each page, 2 or if designated after the transcript has been prepared, each party must cause each copy in their 3 custody or control to be so marked immediately. The parties shall treat all depositions and other 4 pretrial testimony as Confidential until the expiration of the period of time during which the 5 deposition transcript may be designated as Confidential. The Parties may modify this procedure for 6 any particular deposition or proceeding through agreement on the record at such deposition or 7 proceeding or by written stipulation, without further order of the Court. 8 4. Objection to Designation and Modification: If any party believes that a document or 9 other information, which has been designated as Confidential, should not properly be treated as 10 Confidential Information within this Order, that party must notify the disclosing party of its 11 disagreement with the Confidential designation at its earliest opportunity and, in any event, no later 12 than thirty (30) days after Confidential Information has been disclosed/produced to that party. 13 Counsel for the parties will then endeavor to reach an agreement regarding the status of that 14 document or information. If no agreement can be reached, the party seeking to challenge the 15 confidentiality of the document shall file a motion for relief with the Court. Until the Court resolves 16 the motion, the document or information will be treated as Confidential Information (as designated 17 by the designating party) under the terms of this Order. Additionally, a party may agree to produce 18 information only on the condition that it is designated as Confidential. If that condition is accepted 19 by the party to whom the information is produced, the information shall not be subject to de- 20 designation under this paragraph. 21 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Aguilar v. The Neil Jones Food Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aguilar-v-the-neil-jones-food-company-caed-2024.