Aguilar v. The Neil Jones Food Company

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 25, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-01624·Unknown

Opinion

MICHAEL E. WILBUR (State Bar No. 152361) AFRICA E. DAVIDSON (State Bar No. 225680) 1970 Broadway, Suite 850 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 588-1310 Email: mwilbur@apexemploymentlaw.com adavidson@apexemploymentlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant THE NEIL JONES FOOD COMPANY

SANG (JAMES) PARK, (State Bar No. 232956) sang@park-lawyers.com 8383 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 800 Beverly Hills, California 90211 Telephone: (310) 627-2964 Fax: (310) 362-8279

Attorneys for Plaintiff JUAN JOSE ANDRADE AGUILAR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

JUAN JOSE ANDRADE AGUILAR, Case No. 1:23-cv-01624-KES-BAM

Plaintiff, STIPULATION RE [PROPOSED] vs. PROTECTIVE ORDER

THE NEIL JONES FOOD COMPANY; and Action Filed: September 15, 2023 DOES 1 to 10, Trial Date: March 31, 2026

Defendant.

WHEREAS the parties in this action pending in the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:23-cv-01624-KES-BAM (“the Litigation”), anticipate that during the course of the Litigation documents and/or information of a sensitive, private, and confidential nature may be produced in the course of discovery or otherwise disclosed or provided, and the parties wish to protect the confidentiality of such documents or information while ensuring that discovery may be pursued with a minimum of delay and expense; THEREFORE Plaintiff Juan Jose Andrade Aguilar and Defendant The Neil Jones Food Company (hereafter “Party or Parties”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows, and request entry of this proposed protective order consistent with the following terms: 1. Confidential Information”: For purposes of this Order, “Confidential Information” is any type or classification of information that is designated as “Confidential” by any party, whether it be a document, information contained in a document, information revealed during a deposition, information revealed in an interrogatory answer, response to request for admission, or otherwise, that a party in good faith seeks to protect from disclosure or to make subject to only limited disclosure during the Litigation to protect legitimate business interests, the privacy rights of third-persons, or for any other reason, whether or not such information is expressly protected by state or federal law. Confidential Information includes, but is not limited to, the following: (a) Protected Health Information (“PHI”), as defined by California Evidence Code § 1157 and/or California Health and Safety Code §§ 1370 and 1370.1 and/or the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, Civil Code § 56, et seq.; (b) Personnel and employee information (including without limitation the addresses, email addresses, and telephone numbers of present or former employees of Defendant, not including that of Plaintiff; (c) Information the disclosure of which would potentially impair the competitive position of Defendant; (d) Other financial and business information not available to the public; (e) Information relating to the organizational structure of Defendant; and (f) Information relating to the clients of Defendant, including such clients’ personal identifying information or personal health information. 1. Scope of Order: The protections of the Order may be invoked with respect to the originals or copies of any documents, oral testimony, notes, data, information, summaries, extracts, or things (collectively, “materials”) produced, created, or given in the Litigation in any form which contain Confidential Information. 2. Designation of Materials Containing Confidential Information: A party may designate materials as “Confidential” for purposes of this Order in the following manner: (a) Documents (apart from depositions or other pretrial testimony): the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be affixed on the pages containing any Confidential Information at the time such documents are produced, or as soon thereafter as the party seeking protection becomes aware of the confidential nature of the information disclosed and can reasonably make such a designation, except as otherwise agreed upon by the Parties. The Parties may also retroactively designate information or materials that were disclosed or produced prior to entry of a protective order, provided that such designation is made within thirty (30) days of entry of such an order in those instances in which the party is already aware of the confidential nature of the information disclosed or, if not, as soon thereafter as the party seeking protection becomes aware of the confidential nature of the information disclosed and can reasonably make such a designation, except as otherwise agreed upon by the Parties. (b) Depositions Or Other Pretrial Testimony: Witness testimony may be designated as Confidential Information as follows: (i) the designating party, through counsel, may make a statement on the record during such deposition or other pretrial proceeding that the entire transcript or a portion thereof shall be designated as Confidential; or (ii) by counsel’s written notice of such designation sent to counsel for all other parties within thirty (30) days after receipt of the deposition transcript or within thirty (30) days after the entry of a protective order, whichever occurs later. Upon being informed that certain portions of a deposition disclose Confidential Information, the court reporter shall separately bind the appropriate pages and stamp “Confidential” on each page, or if designated after the transcript has been prepared, each party must cause each copy in their custody or control to be so marked immediately. The parties shall treat all depositions and other pretrial testimony as Confidential until the expiration of the period of time during which the deposition transcript may be designated as Confidential. The Parties may modify this procedure for any particular deposition or proceeding through agreement on the record at such deposition or proceeding or by written stipulation, without further order of the Court. 4. Objection to Designation and Modification: If any party believes that a document or other information, which has been designated as Confidential, should not properly be treated as Confidential Information within this Order, that party must notify the disclosing party of its disagreement with the Confidential designation at its earliest opportunity and, in any event, no later than thirty (30) days after Confidential Information has been disclosed/produced to that party. Counsel for the parties will then endeavor to reach an agreement regarding the status of that document or information. If no agreement can be reached, the party seeking to challenge the confidentiality of the document shall file a motion for relief with the Court. Until the Court resolves the motion, the document or information will be treated as Confidential Information (as designated by the designating party) under the terms of this Order. Additionally, a party may agree to produce information only on the condition that it is designated as Confidential. If that condition is accepted by the party to whom the information is produced, the information shall not be subject to de- designation under this paragraph. 5. Persons To Whom Confidential Information May Be Disclosed: Except as may be provided by order of the Court, or provided in Paragraph 6, information designated “Confidential” may be disclosed only to: (a) the parties to this Litigation, and officers, directors, and employees of any party; (b) the parties’ attorneys, including “inside” and “outside” counsel, and their support staff, investigators, legal assistants, agents and employees; (c) experts or consultants (together with their clerical staff), retained by such counsel to assist in the prosecution, defense, or settlement of the Litigation; (d) the judiciary specific to the Litigation, its emplo

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aguilar v. The Neil Jones Food Company, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Aguilar v. The Neil Jones Food Company (Aguilar v. The Neil Jones Food Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)