Aguilar v. Stone

Court of Appeals of Texas

Aguilar v. Stone

901 S.W.2d 955, 1995 WL 347820

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJuly 6, 1995

Docket01-95-00520-CV

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 901 S.W.2d 955 (Aguilar v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aguilar v. Stone, 901 S.W.2d 955, 1995 WL 347820 (Tex. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On this day the Court considered relator’s motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus. In his petition, relator asks this Court to direct respondents to issue citation in cause number 94-059569, styled Timothy A. Aguilar v. Briar Forest Place Apartments. Under Tex.R.Civ.P. 145, a pro se plaintiff who files an affidavit of indigency is entitled to the issuance of citation.

The records of the Harris County District Clerk indicate that citation was issued in the above referenced suit, that service was attempted in early January 1995, but was returned to the clerk’s office un-served. Citation is issued when it “is sent forth from the clerk’s office under his sanction and authority and given to an officer, or to some one else to give to an officer, for the purpose of being served.” London v. Chandler, 406 S.W.2d 203, 204 (Tex.1966). When the district clerk delivered the citation to the process server, his duty was fulfilled. It is relator’s responsibility to see that the process server is able to accomplish service of process. See Primate Const., Inc. v. Silver, 884 S.W.2d 151, 153 (Tex.1994) (it is the responsibility of one requesting service of process to see that service is properly accomplished). Had relator requested the district clerk to serve citation by registered or certified mail pursuant to Tex.R.Civ.P. 103 & 106(a)(2) and the clerk had refused to do so, mandamus would be an appropriate remedy.

We OVERRULE relator’s motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On this day the Court considered relator’s motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus. In his petition, relator asks this Court to direct respondents to issue citation in cause number 94-059569, styled Timothy A. Aguilar v. Briar Forest Place Apartments. Under Tex.R.Civ.P. 145, a pro se plaintiff who files an affidavit of indigency is entitled to the issuance of citation.

The records of the Harris County District Clerk indicate that citation was issued in the above referenced suit, that service was attempted in early January 1995, but was returned to the clerk’s office un-served. Citation is issued when it “is sent forth from the clerk’s office under his sanction and authority and given to an officer, or to some one else to give to an officer, for the purpose of being served.” London v. Chandler, 406 S.W.2d 203, 204 (Tex.1966). When the district clerk delivered the citation to the process server, his duty was fulfilled. It is relator’s responsibility to see that the process server is able to accomplish service of process. See Primate Const., Inc. v. Silver, 884 S.W.2d 151, 153 (Tex.1994) (it is the responsibility of one requesting service of process to see that service is properly accomplished). Had relator requested the district clerk to serve citation by registered or certified mail pursuant to Tex.R.Civ.P. 103 & 106(a)(2) and the clerk had refused to do so, mandamus would be an appropriate remedy.

We OVERRULE relator’s motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

901 S.W.2d 955, 1995 WL 347820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aguilar-v-stone-texapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack