Aguilar v. State
916 So. 2d 34, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19171, 2005 WL 3295754
This text of 916 So. 2d 34 (Aguilar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Aguilar v. State, 916 So. 2d 34, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19171, 2005 WL 3295754 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
Opinion
Because the claimant has failed to state a facially sufficient claim for jail credit in his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), the trial court’s final order denying the motion is AFFIRMED. See Koester v. State, 864 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Koester v. State
864 So. 2d 1282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
916 So. 2d 34, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19171, 2005 WL 3295754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aguilar-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.