Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Aguilar v. State

Aguilar v. State

916 So. 2d 34, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19171, 2005 WL 3295754
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 7, 2005·No. No. 1D05-4131·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the claimant has failed to state a facially sufficient claim for jail credit in his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), the trial court’s final order denying the motion is AFFIRMED. See Koester v. State, 864 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

ERVIN, DAVIS and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aguilar v. State, 916 So. 2d 34, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19171, 2005 WL 3295754 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

916 So. 2d 34 (Aguilar v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Koester v. State
864 So. 2d 1282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)