Aguilar v. State
This text of 807 So. 2d 804 (Aguilar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Luis M. AGUILAR, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Luis M. Aguilar, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Gary K. Milligan (Fort Lauderdale), Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and SORONDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
After conducting the evidentiary hearing ordered in Aguilar v. State, 756 So.2d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), upon the "defendant's claim of misrepresentations by counsel as to the length of sentence and eligibility for gain time," Aguilar, 756 So.2d at 258, the trial court found that no such misrepresentation had occurred. We find no error in this finding, which is amply supported by the record below, nor in the denial of Aguilar's request for counsel. See Graham v. State, 372 So.2d 1363 (Fla.1979). Accordingly, the order denying post-conviction relief is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
807 So. 2d 804, 2002 WL 269184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aguilar-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.