Aguilar v. State

807 So. 2d 804, 2002 WL 269184
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 2002·No. 3D00-2520·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

807 So.2d 804 (2002)

Luis M. AGUILAR, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D00-2520.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 27, 2002.

Luis M. Aguilar, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Gary K. Milligan (Fort Lauderdale), Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and SORONDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

After conducting the evidentiary hearing ordered in Aguilar v. State, 756 So.2d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), upon the "defendant's claim of misrepresentations by counsel as to the length of sentence and eligibility for gain time," Aguilar, 756 So.2d at 258, the trial court found that no such misrepresentation had occurred. We find no error in this finding, which is amply supported by the record below, nor in the denial of Aguilar's request for counsel. See Graham v. State, 372 So.2d 1363 (Fla.1979). Accordingly, the order denying post-conviction relief is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aguilar v. State, 807 So. 2d 804, 2002 WL 269184 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

807 So. 2d 804 (Aguilar v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holmes v. State
964 So. 2d 762 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Tedesco v. State
807 So. 2d 804 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)