Aguilar v. Reckson Associates Realty Corp.

26 A.D.3d 449, 810 N.Y.S.2d 513

This text of 26 A.D.3d 449 (Aguilar v. Reckson Associates Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aguilar v. Reckson Associates Realty Corp., 26 A.D.3d 449, 810 N.Y.S.2d 513 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated August 24, 2004, which granted the separate motions of the defendant Reckson Associates Realty Corp. and the third-party defendant L&L Gardens, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiff slipped and fell on ice on the exterior stairs of a building managed by the defendant Reckson Associates Realty Corp. Pursuant to a written snow removal contract, the third-party defendant L&L Gardens, Inc., performed snow and ice removal services on the premises. The Supreme Court granted the respective motions of those parties for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We affirm.

A party in control of real property may not be held liable for accidents occurring as a result of the accumulation of snow or ice on its premises until an adequate period of time has passed following the cessation of a storm to allow the party to remedy the hazardous condition (see Gor v High View Estates Owners Corp., 17 AD3d 316 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 709 [2005]; Dowden v Long Is. R.R., 305 AD2d 631 [2003]).

The defendant and L&L Gardens, Inc., established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment with evidence of the plaintiff’s own observations that there was ongoing precipitation at the time of the accident. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gor v. High View Estates Owners Corp.
17 A.D.3d 316 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Dowden v. Long Island Rail Road
305 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 A.D.3d 449, 810 N.Y.S.2d 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aguilar-v-reckson-associates-realty-corp-nyappdiv-2006.