Aguilar v. Nicholson

164 F. App'x 985
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJanuary 23, 2006
DocketNo. 06-7017
StatusPublished

This text of 164 F. App'x 985 (Aguilar v. Nicholson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aguilar v. Nicholson, 164 F. App'x 985 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

Francia V. Aguilar responds to this court’s order directing her to show cause [986]*986why her appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed.

Aguilar argues that her appeal was timely “served,” i.e., placed in the mail before the clue date. However, unlike documents whose due date is determined by the date of service (such as a brief), a notice of appeal must be “filed” by the due date. A notice of appeal from a decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims is filed when it is received by the lower court. 38 U.S.C. § 7292; Fed. R.App. P. 4.

Because Aguilar’s notice of appeal was received by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 64 days after the entry of judgment, the appeal must be dismissed as untimely filed.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The appeal is dismissed as untimely filed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 F. App'x 985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aguilar-v-nicholson-cafc-2006.