AGUILAR-TURCIOS v. Holder

Ninth Circuit

AGUILAR-TURCIOS v. Holder

652 F.3d 1236, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17998, 2011 WL 3805758

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 29, 2011

Docket06-73451

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 652 F.3d 1236 (AGUILAR-TURCIOS v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

AGUILAR-TURCIOS v. Holder, 652 F.3d 1236, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17998, 2011 WL 3805758 (9th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Agency No. A045-301-132.

Before: PAMELA ANN RYMER, RICHARD A. PAEZ, and JAY S. BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion filed on September 29, 2009, and reported at Aguilar-Turcios v. Holder, 582 F.3d 1093 (9th Cir.2009), is WITHDRAWN.

The parties are directed to file supplemental briefs addressing the following issue: What effect, if any, does United States v. Aguilar-Montes De Oca, 655 F.3d 915 (9th Cir.2011) (en banc), have on this case?

Petitioner’s supplemental brief shall be filed within 21 days from the date of filing of this order. Respondent shall then have 21 days to file a supplemental responsive brief. Petitioner shall have 14 days to file an optional reply brief. The supplemental briefs and reply brief shall not exceed 15 pages.

Submission of this case is vacated.

With the filing of this order, the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI