Aguilar (Jose) Vs. Warden
This text of Aguilar (Jose) Vs. Warden (Aguilar (Jose) Vs. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JOSE AGUILAR, No. 82836 Appellant, vs. BRIAN WILLIAMS, WARDEN, FILED Respondent. SEP 1 0 2021 P•ROWN RENE COURT
YCL ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Erika D. Ballou, Judge. Appellant has filed a pro se motion to voluntarily dismiss his appeal of a writ of mandamus. In his notice of appeal, appellant explains that the district court treated his petition for a writ of mandamus as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and denied it. Under these circumstances, appellant's motion to dismiss his writ of mandamus is treated as a motion to dismiss this appeal from the order disrnissing appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The motion is granted and this appeal is dismissed. It is so ORDERED.
Cadish CRIK , J.
Nap, J. Pickering Herndon SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I947A 62)40 . „ * " , 44:2 cc: Hon. Erika D. Ballou, District Judge Jose Aguilar Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A AD. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Aguilar (Jose) Vs. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aguilar-jose-vs-warden-nev-2021.