Aguila v. Corporate Caterers IV, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit

Aguila v. Corporate Caterers IV, Inc.

683 F. App'x 746

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 24, 2017·No. No. 16-15838·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Having carefully considered the written submissions and the arguments of the parties and of the amicus curiae, we conclude that there is no free standing claim for relief under section 203(m) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 203(m), where, as here, there is no allegation that the employer does not pay the minimum wage. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Having carefully considered the written submissions and the arguments of the parties and of the amicus curiae, we conclude that there is no free standing claim for relief under section 203(m) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 203(m), where, as here, there is no allegation that the employer does not pay the minimum wage. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Aguila v. Corporate Caterers IV, Inc., 683 F. App'x 746 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

683 F. App'x 746 (Aguila v. Corporate Caterers IV, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related