Aguiar v. Pare

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided January 31, 2019·No. Civil Action No. 2018-2777·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

MICHAEL AGUIAR, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 18-cv-2777 (KBJ)

)

KIMBERLY PARE, )

)

Defendants. )

)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 4, 2018, the defendant in this matter filed a motion to dismiss

plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 4.) The Court advised the plaintiff of his obligations

under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond

to the motion, and specifically warned plaintiff that, if he did not respond to the motion

by January 11, 2019, the Court may treat the motion as conceded. (ECF No. 6.) To

date, the plaintiff has neither filed an opposition to the motion nor has requested more

time to do so. Therefore, the Court will GRANT the defendant’s motion as conceded

and will DISMISS this action without prejudice.

A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: January 31, 2019 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aguiar v. Pare, (D.D.C. 2019).

Aguiar v. Pare (Aguiar v. Pare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.