Agua Special Utility District v. Basilisa Perez Gonzalez, Rosalva Sosa, Raquel G. Chatriwala, Rogelio Gonzales, Rolando Gonzalez, Rebecca G. Ramirez, Ramon Gonzalez III, Roel Gonzalez, Ricardo Gonzalez and Heirs and Unknown Heirs, Assigns or Devisees of Ramon Gonzalez

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: February 12, 2015
• Docket: 13-14-00593-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-14-00593-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

AGUA SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT, Appellant,

v.

BASILISA PEREZ GONZALEZ, ROSALVA SOSA, RAQUEL G. CHATRIWALA, ROGELIO GONZALES, ROLANDO GONZALEZ, REBECCA G. RAMIREZ, RAMON GONZALEZ III, ROEL GONZALEZ, RICARDO GONZALEZ AND HEIRS AND UNKNOWN HEIRS, ASSIGNS OR DEVISEES OF RAMON GONZALEZ, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 8 of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No.

8 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CCD-0125-H. Appellant has filed an amended motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds it no longer wishes to pursue the

appeal. The certificate of conference reflects that appellant was unable to confer with

appellees because appellant does not have a valid phone number or electronic mail

address or facsimile number for appellees.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED. There being no agreement in the motion regarding costs, pursuant to Rule

42.1(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all costs are taxed against appellant.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs

against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion

for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 12th day of February, 2015.