Home/Supreme Court/Agricultural Prorate Commission v. Mutual Orange Distributors

Agricultural Prorate Commission v. Mutual Orange Distributors

318 U.S. 744, 63 S. Ct. 849
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 5, 1943
DocketNo. 288
StatusPublished

This text of 318 U.S. 744 (Agricultural Prorate Commission v. Mutual Orange Distributors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Agricultural Prorate Commission v. Mutual Orange Distributors, 318 U.S. 744, 63 S. Ct. 849 (1943).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to vacate the judgment is granted. The judgment of the District Court is vacated, without costs to either party in this Court, and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the bill of complaint as moot. United States v. Hamburg-American Co., 239 U. S. 466, 477-8; Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216; Paramount Pictures v. Langer, 306 U. S. 619; Retail Food Clerks & Managers Union v. Union [745]*745Premier Food Stores, 308 U. S. 526.

Messrs. Earl Warren, Attorney General of California, and Walter L. Bowers, Deputy Attorney General, for appellants. Mr. Guy Richards Crump for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt-Actien Gesellschaft
239 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 1916)
Brownlow v. Schwartz
261 U.S. 216 (Supreme Court, 1923)
Paramount Pictures, Inc. v. Langer
306 U.S. 619 (Supreme Court, 1939)
Retail Food Clerks & Managers Union, Local No. 1357 v. Union Premier Food Stores, Inc.
308 U.S. 526 (Supreme Court, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
318 U.S. 744, 63 S. Ct. 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agricultural-prorate-commission-v-mutual-orange-distributors-scotus-1943.