Agricultural Enterprises, Inc. v. McPherson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Agricultural Enterprises, Inc. v. McPherson

160 So. 2d 451, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1304

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 9, 1964

DocketNo. 10108

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 160 So. 2d 451 (Agricultural Enterprises, Inc. v. McPherson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Agricultural Enterprises, Inc. v. McPherson, 160 So. 2d 451, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1304 (La. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

HARDY, Judge.

Before this court motion to dismiss the appeal has been filed by plaintiff-appellee. The recitals of the motion are that final judgment of the trial court was read and signed on April 11, 1963, on which date counsel for the parties litigant signed a waiver of notice; a motion for a new trial was not filed; devolutive appeal was taken by defendant-appellant on the same date and the security required was fixed by the court; a devolutive appeal was again taken by defendant-appellant on June 27, 1963, and, again, the security was fixed by the trial court; and, finally, the security required for the perfection of the appeal was not furnished until the filing of bond on August 12, 1963, which was well beyond the ninety day period of delay as provided in LSA-C.C.P. Article 2087.

The facts above asserted are evident on the face of the record before us, have not been disputed and no answer has been made thereto on behalf of defendant-appellant.

It follows that the motion to dismiss should be, and, accordingly, it is sustained and the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARDY, Judge.

Before this court motion to dismiss the appeal has been filed by plaintiff-appellee. The recitals of the motion are that final judgment of the trial court was read and signed on April 11, 1963, on which date counsel for the parties litigant signed a waiver of notice; a motion for a new trial was not filed; devolutive appeal was taken by defendant-appellant on the same date and the security required was fixed by the court; a devolutive appeal was again taken by defendant-appellant on June 27, 1963, and, again, the security was fixed by the trial court; and, finally, the security required for the perfection of the appeal was not furnished until the filing of bond on August 12, 1963, which was well beyond the ninety day period of delay as provided in LSA-C.C.P. Article 2087.

The facts above asserted are evident on the face of the record before us, have not been disputed and no answer has been made thereto on behalf of defendant-appellant.

It follows that the motion to dismiss should be, and, accordingly, it is sustained and the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 So. 2d 451, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agricultural-enterprises-inc-v-mcpherson-lactapp-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack