Agricultural Co. v. Pierce County

73 U.S. 246, 18 L. Ed. 739, 6 Wall. 246, 1867 U.S. LEXIS 963
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Agricultural Co. v. Pierce County. Read the opinion of the Court — 73 U.S. 246
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 23, 1867·Published

Opinion

73 U.S. 246 (____)
6 Wall. 246

AGRICULTURAL COMPANY
v.
PIERCE COUNTY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Messrs. Lander and Carlisle, for the plaintiff in error; no opposite counsel appearing nor having entered their appearance of record.

ERROR to the Supreme Court of Washington Territory.

The writ of error bore date January 20th, 1862. It was on its face made returnable on the second Monday of December next after its date, when it should have been the first Monday of that month, which is by law the day on which the terms of this court commence each year.

For this cause (Mr. Justice MILLER, announcing the order), the writ of error was dismissed under the authority of the cases of Carroll v. Dorsey,[‡] Insurance Company v. Mordecai,[§] and Porter v. Foley,[†] heretofore decided by this court.

NOTES

[‡] 20 Howard, 204.

[§] 21 Id. 195.

[†] Id. 393.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Agricultural Co. v. Pierce County, 73 U.S. 246, 18 L. Ed. 739, 6 Wall. 246, 1867 U.S. LEXIS 963 (1867).

73 U.S. 246 (Agricultural Co. v. Pierce County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Agricultural Co. v. Pierce County
73 U.S. 246 (Supreme Court, 1867)