Agricultural Bond & Credit Corp. v. Koenig

Supreme Court of Kansas

Agricultural Bond & Credit Corp. v. Koenig

19 P.2d 1114, 137 Kan. 240, 1933 Kan. LEXIS 90

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedMarch 24, 1933

DocketNo. 30,780

StatusPublished

This text of 19 P.2d 1114 (Agricultural Bond & Credit Corp. v. Koenig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Agricultural Bond & Credit Corp. v. Koenig, 19 P.2d 1114, 137 Kan. 240, 1933 Kan. LEXIS 90 (kan 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This appeal was disposed of in an opinion filed on December 10, 1932. (136 Kan. 514.) Appellant now moves the court to revise the text of that opinion in respect to our comment on the erased and altered date of the assignment of the so-called “negotiable trust receipt,” from which an inference could be drawn that the erasure and alteration were perpetrated fraudulently. It is now shown by apparently credible affidavits that the imperfect erasure and alteration happened otherwise.

The order will therefore be that appellant’s motion is sustained, and the court’s comment on the matter of the erased and altered date will be stricken from the official opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This appeal was disposed of in an opinion filed on December 10, 1932. (136 Kan. 514.) Appellant now moves the court to revise the text of that opinion in respect to our comment on the erased and altered date of the assignment of the so-called “negotiable trust receipt,” from which an inference could be drawn that the erasure and alteration were perpetrated fraudulently. It is now shown by apparently credible affidavits that the imperfect erasure and alteration happened otherwise.

The order will therefore be that appellant’s motion is sustained, and the court’s comment on the matter of the erased and altered date will be stricken from the official opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 P.2d 1114, 137 Kan. 240, 1933 Kan. LEXIS 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agricultural-bond-credit-corp-v-koenig-kan-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack