Agri Process Innovations, Inc. v. Imo

Missouri Court of Appeals

Agri Process Innovations, Inc. v. Imo

395 S.W.3d 85, 2013 WL 1412142, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 432

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 9, 2013·No. No. ED 98406·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

High Hill Biodiesel, Inc., and High Hill Biofuel, LLC (“High Hill”) appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of Agri Process Innovations, Inc. (“API”) and Greenline Fabrications, LLC (“Green-line”).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the judgment if the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Further, no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

High Hill Biodiesel, Inc., and High Hill Biofuel, LLC (“High Hill”) appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of Agri Process Innovations, Inc. (“API”) and Greenline Fabrications, LLC (“Green-line”).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the judgment if the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Further, no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Agri Process Innovations, Inc. v. Imo, 395 S.W.3d 85, 2013 WL 1412142, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 432 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

395 S.W.3d 85 (Agri Process Innovations, Inc. v. Imo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.