Agress v. Turkmenilli
103 N.E.2d 900, 303 N.Y. 797, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 1287
Opinion
In each proceeding .* Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye and Froessel, JJ. Loughran, Ch. J., and Fuld, J., dissent on the ground that plaintiffs waived their rights under the arbitration clause in prosecuting their action against the defendant as they did.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Agress v. Turkmenilli, 103 N.E.2d 900, 303 N.Y. 797, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 1287 (N.Y. 1952).
103 N.E.2d 900 (Agress v. Turkmenilli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Griesenbeck
234 N.E.2d 456 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)