Agress v. Harmon National Real Estate Corp.
This text of 260 A.D. 1029 (Agress v. Harmon National Real Estate Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order granting plaintiff’s motion to strike out as insufficient in law the first partial defense contained in defendant’s amended answer reversed on the law, with ten" dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied with ten dollars costs. In our opinion plaintiff’s cause of action is for money had and received, based upon an executed rescission of certain contracts for fraud and, therefore, defendant is entitled to invoke the provisions of subdivision 1 of section 48 of the Civil Practice Act. (Cohen v. City Company of New York, 283 N. Y. 112; Steinert v. Title Guarantee and Trust Company, 258 App. Div. 927; affd., 283 N. Y. 636; Hamill v. Title Guarantee and Trust Company, 260 App. Div. 873.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 A.D. 1029, 24 N.Y.S.2d 487, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agress-v-harmon-national-real-estate-corp-nyappdiv-1940.