Agoglia v. Mulrooney
235 A.D. 696
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1932
StatusPublished
This text of 235 A.D. 696 (Agoglia v. Mulrooney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Agoglia v. Mulrooney, 235 A.D. 696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
Opinion
Peremptory mandamus order unanimously affirmed as a matter of law and not of discretion, with costs. (Matter of Lee v. Quigley, 231 App. Div. 858; Matter of Picone v. Comr. of Licenses, 241 N. Y. 157, 161.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Matter of Picone v. Comr. of Licenses
149 N.E. 336 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)
Lee v. Quigley
231 A.D. 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agoglia-v-mulrooney-nyappdiv-1932.