Ago v. Canner

45 N.E. 754, 167 Mass. 390, 1897 Mass. LEXIS 349
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 9, 1897·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Allen, J.

The property belonged to the plaintiff. Her title to it was never lost. In this Commonwealth, a husband no longer has a right to make his wife’s personal property his own, by reducing it to his own possession. Her husband’s acts did not deprive her of her title, or of her right to maintain an action to enforce her title. Pub. Sts. c. 147, § 1. McCowan v. Donaldson, 128 Mass. 169. Pacific National Bank v. Windram, 133 [392]*392Mass. 175. Butler v. Ives, 139 Mass. 202. Harmon v. Old Colony Railroad, 165 Mass. 100.

Exceptions overruled, with double costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ago v. Canner, 45 N.E. 754, 167 Mass. 390, 1897 Mass. LEXIS 349 (Mass. 1897).

45 N.E. 754 (Ago v. Canner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guiffre v. Carapezza
11 N.E.2d 433 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)
McDonald v. Hartford Trust Co.
132 A. 902 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1926)