Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports·Decided March 28, 1977·Published

Opinion

QUESTIONS:

1. Do the provisions of s. 5(a), Art. II, State Const., or s. 110.092(4)(a), F. S., prohibit a comptroller for a community college district from serving simultaneously as a state legislator?

2. Would said comptroller have to resign his position in order to run for the office of state legislator?

SUMMARY:

The comptroller of a community college is an employee of a community college district board of trustees; hence, the dual officeholding prohibition of s. 5(a), Art. II, State Const., does not preclude such comptroller from serving simultaneously as a state legislator, nor does such simultaneous service violate the public policy rule against holding two imcompatible offices or positions. A community college comptroller is not a state employee within the Career Service System; hence, the provisions of s. 110.092(4)(a), F. S., which restrict the political activities of state employees are inapplicable to an employee of a community college district board of trustees. Section 104.31(1), F. S., does not operate to bar such employee from running for or holding legislative office, although a rule or regulation of the State Board of Education or local community college district board of trustees may prohibit such activity. Such comptroller is not required to resign to run for the office of state legislator, because s. 99.012, F. S., includes only those persons holding offices within its terms.

AS TO QUESTION 1:

Section 5(a), Art. II, State Const., provides in pertinent part that `[n]o person shall hold at the same time more than one office under the government of the State and the counties and municipalities therein . . . .' A legislator is clearly a state officer within the purview of the foregoing constitutional provision. See In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 79 So. 874 (Fla. 1918). Although you note in your letter that the comptroller would serve in such capacity only when not `sitting' as a legislator, this factor is not relevant for purposes of the foregoing constitutional provision. Clearly, a legislator is an officer within the meaning of s. 5(a), Art. II, for the duration of his term of office; therefore, the important consideration is whether the position of comptroller of a community college is also an `office' or whether such position is merely `employment' which is not within the scope of the constitutional prohibition. See AGO's 069-3, 071-209, and 074-73; and cf. Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 132 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1961). The State Constitution does not define `office' or `officers,' but, as interpreted by the Florida Supreme Court,

The term `office' implies a delegation of a portion of the sovereign power to, and the possession of it by, the person filling the office, while an employment does not comprehend a delegation of any part of the sovereign authority. The term office embraces the idea of tenure, duration, and duties in exercising some portion of the sovereign power, conferred or defined by law and not by contract. [State v. Sheats, 83 So. 508 (1919).]

Previous opinions of this office have indicated that the statutory descriptions of the respective position involved are important factors in determining whether or not such positions constitute `offices' or `employment.' See AGO 071-263, holding that an assistant state attorney is not an officer for purposes of s. 5(a), Art. II, supra; and AGO 069-5, holding that an assistant public defender is not a governmental officer. Compare: In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 113 So. 913 (Fla. 1927), holding that a legislator could not be appointed to the office of State Motor Vehicle Commissioner, or to the office of `special assistant to the Attorney General,' because the statute providing for such positions clearly conferred upon the incumbents `. . . governmental authority and functions with a term of office and duties prescribed by law.'

In this regard, I find no statute which invests community college comptrollers with any official powers whatsoever. To the contrary, s. 230.759, F. S., states:

Employment of all personnel in each community college shall be upon recommendation of the president, subject to rejection for cause by the board of trustees and subject to the rules and regulations of the state board relative to certification, tenure, leaves of absence of all types, including sabbaticals, remuneration, and such other conditions of employment as the Division of Community Colleges deems necessary and proper; and to policies of the board of trustees not inconsistent with law.

Moreover, it has been held that members of community college boards of trustees are not officers within the meaning of s. 5(a), Art. II, supra, as such persons are officers of a special district rather than of the state, county, or municipality. See AGO's 075-153 and 073-47.

Accordingly, I am of the view that the position of community college comptroller constitutes a position of employment; therefore, the simultaneous service of an individual as a comptroller of a community college and as a member of the Florida Legislature does not violate the dual officeholding prohibition contained in s. 5(a), Art. II, State Const.

There still remains, however, the question of whether such service would violate the common law rule prohibiting the holding of incompatible positions. Disqualifying incompatibility exists under the rule when there is a conflict or clash between the two employments or positions as where

. . . one is subordinate to the other and subject in some degree to the supervisory power of its incumbent, or where the incumbent of one has the power to appoint or remove or set the salary of the other, or where the duties clash, inviting the incumbent to prefer one obligation over the other. [Attorney General Opinion 070-46.]

Applying this definition to the instant inquiry, I see no singificant clash between the two respective positions which would constitute a violation of the common law. Although the Legislature in the exercise of its lawmaking powers appropriates funds to the Division of Community Colleges in the Department of Education, which funds may be used to pay the salary of the comptroller, the authority to set the comptroller's salary has been delegated to the community college district boards of trustees in accordance with regulations of the State Board of Education. See ss. 230.753(2)(a), 230.754(2)(a), 230.760, 230.752, and 230.769, F. S.See also Ch. 6A-14.247(5)(b) and (c), F.A.C.; also Ch. 6A-14.46, F.A.C., providing that `each board [of trustees] shall annually adopt . . . a salary schedule for employees of the community colleges . . . .'

As to whether the community college comptroller would violate the terms of s. 110.092, F. S., by serving as a state legislator, I believe this question must also be answered in the negative. Section 110.092(4)(a) provides, in pertinent part, that

. . . no employee in the classified service shall.

(a) Hold, or be a candidate for, public or political office while in the employment of the state or take any active part within any period of time during which he is expected to perform services for which he receives compensation from the state. . . . (Emphasis supplied.)

The application of the foregoing statute is limited by its terms to employees within the State Career Service System.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ago, (Fla. 1977).

Ago (Ago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Board of Control
131 So. 2d 713 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1961)
Advisory Opinion to the Governor
113 So. 913 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor
132 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1961)
In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor
79 So. 874 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1918)
State ex rel. Holloway v. Sheats
83 So. 508 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1919)
Resedean v. Civil Service Board of Pensacola
332 So. 2d 150 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)