Ago
Opinion
QUESTIONS: 1. Does the owner of real property who places a mobile home thereon and permanently affixes it to the land prior to January 1 of the tax year have a choice of being taxed on the mobile home and the land both as real property or of paying a license tax and placing an "MH" tag on the mobile home with only the land being taxed as real property? 2. Does the owner of a mobile home which has been permanently affixed to land and has been taxed as real property have the option at a later date to request that the assessor take the mobile home off the real property rolls and that the owner be allowed to purchase an "MH" license tag? 3. What type of tag is the owner of real property who purchases a mobile home in March of any given year and permanently affixes it to the land required to have on this mobile home in the year of purchase? 4. Assuming the same facts as in question 3, is there any way a mobile home owner can be exempt from buying an "MH" license tag for the portion of the year of purchase and have the mobile home placed on the real property roll the following year?
SUMMARY: The decision as to whether a mobile home which has been purchased and placed on land belonging to the mobile home owner is taxable as real property or as a motor vehicle is one which must be made by the assessor and the owner does not, per se, have a "choice" as to its tax classification. However, the mobile home owner does have a choice as to whether the mobile home is to be "permanently affixed" to his or her land. Once this choice is made and the mobile home is permanently affixed to the land and taxed as real property, the owner may not receive an MH tag. Reclassification of a mobile home from real property to a motor vehicle requires a determination by the assessor as to severance of the mobile home from the realty. When a mobile home is purchased and permanently affixed to land subsequent to the January 1 tax day, there is no statutory exception to the requirement that an MH license plate must be purchased for the mobile home for that year. Questions 1 and 2 should, in my opinion, be answered in the negative; question 3 is answered in the following discussion; and question 4 is answered in the negative. Essentially the same issue raised by question 1 was considered previously in AGO 072-371 wherein I expressed the opinion that while the ultimate determination of whether a mobile home has been "permanently affixed" to land and thus should be taxed as real property is to be made by the assessor, the intent of the owner is one of the factors which should be considered and indeed has been held to be "the chief element to be considered." Commercial Finance Co. v. Brooksville Hotel Co.,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ago (Ago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.