Agnew, H., Pet v. Hon.
This text of Agnew, H., Pet v. Hon. (Agnew, H., Pet v. Hon.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
HENRY CHARLES AGNEW, : No. 11 WM 2019 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : HIRAM A. CARPENTER III, JUDGE, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2019, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Agnew, H., Pet v. Hon., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agnew-h-pet-v-hon-pa-2019.