Agnes Fraser, of the Estate of Hector Fraser v. United States

Second Circuit

Agnes Fraser, of the Estate of Hector Fraser v. United States

83 F.3d 591, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11184

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMay 13, 1996

Docket1495, Docket 95-6334

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 83 F.3d 591 (Agnes Fraser, of the Estate of Hector Fraser v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Agnes Fraser, of the Estate of Hector Fraser v. United States, 83 F.3d 591, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11184 (2d Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal from a judgment of the District Court for the District of Connecticut (Warren W. Eginton, Judge), dismissing a suit against the United States, brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (1994), we certified two questions of Connecticut law to the Connecticut Supreme Court (“the Court”). See Fraser v. United States, 30 F.3d 18 (2d Cir.1994). After some delay occasioned by the Court’s request for a certification of a statement of the relevant factual circumstances and the parties’ efforts to agree on an appropriate response to the Court’s request, the matter was ultimately argued before the Court on December 5, 1995, and a decision was released on April 16,1996.

After slightly reformulating the two questions we certified into one question — “In the circumstances of this case, does a psychotherapist have a duty to control a patient being treated on an outpatient basis in order to prevent harm to third persons?” — the Court answered the question in the negative. Fraser v. United States, 236 Conn. 625, 627 & n. 3, 674 A.2d 811 (1996). Since Connecticut law governs the substantive issues of liability in this FTCA suit, the Court’s authoritative ruling on Connecticut law defeats the plaintiffs claim that the United States is liable for the death of plaintiffs decedent *592 because employees of the West Haven Veteran’s Administration Medical Center breached a duty of control alleged to be owed to the plaintiffs decedent.

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal from a judgment of the District Court for the District of Connecticut (Warren W. Eginton, Judge), dismissing a suit against the United States, brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (1994), we certified two questions of Connecticut law to the Connecticut Supreme Court (“the Court”). See Fraser v. United States, 30 F.3d 18 (2d Cir.1994). After some delay occasioned by the Court’s request for a certification of a statement of the relevant factual circumstances and the parties’ efforts to agree on an appropriate response to the Court’s request, the matter was ultimately argued before the Court on December 5, 1995, and a decision was released on April 16,1996.

After slightly reformulating the two questions we certified into one question — “In the circumstances of this case, does a psychotherapist have a duty to control a patient being treated on an outpatient basis in order to prevent harm to third persons?” — the Court answered the question in the negative. Fraser v. United States, 236 Conn. 625, 627 & n. 3, 674 A.2d 811 (1996). Since Connecticut law governs the substantive issues of liability in this FTCA suit, the Court’s authoritative ruling on Connecticut law defeats the plaintiffs claim that the United States is liable for the death of plaintiffs decedent *592 because employees of the West Haven Veteran’s Administration Medical Center breached a duty of control alleged to be owed to the plaintiffs decedent.

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 F.3d 591, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agnes-fraser-of-the-estate-of-hector-fraser-v-united-states-ca2-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack