Home/Supreme Court/Agles v. Stolze Lumber Co.

Agles v. Stolze Lumber Co.

290 U.S. 604, 54 S. Ct. 375, 78 L. Ed. 530, 1934 U.S. LEXIS 460
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 8, 1934
DocketNo. 665
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 290 U.S. 604 (Agles v. Stolze Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Agles v. Stolze Lumber Co., 290 U.S. 604, 54 S. Ct. 375, 78 L. Ed. 530, 1934 U.S. LEXIS 460 (1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the [605]*605appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 _(a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as an application for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c), Judicial Code, as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.

Mr. Ferdinand Tunnell for appellant. Messrs. Thomas Williamson and George D. Burroughs for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Callendar v. State
181 So. 2d 529 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
290 U.S. 604, 54 S. Ct. 375, 78 L. Ed. 530, 1934 U.S. LEXIS 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agles-v-stolze-lumber-co-scotus-1934.