Agles v. Stolze Lumber Co.

Supreme Court

Agles v. Stolze Lumber Co.

290 U.S. 604, 54 S. Ct. 375, 78 L. Ed. 530, 1934 U.S. LEXIS 460

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 8, 1934·No. No. 665·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the [605] appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 _(a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as an application for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c), Judicial Code, as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.

Mr. Ferdinand Tunnell for appellant. Messrs. Thomas Williamson and George D. Burroughs for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the [605] appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 _(a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as an application for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c), Judicial Code, as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.

Mr. Ferdinand Tunnell for appellant. Messrs. Thomas Williamson and George D. Burroughs for appellee.

Agles v. Stolze Lumber Co., 290 U.S. 604, 54 S. Ct. 375, 78 L. Ed. 530, 1934 U.S. LEXIS 460 (1934).

Pincite

290 U.S. 604 (Agles v. Stolze Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related