AGL Constructors, a Joint Venture Arche Western Contractors, LLC, Granite Construction Company and the Lane Construction Corp. v. PTG-HDR JV, Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. and HDR Engineering, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 15, 2022
Docket05-20-00053-CV
StatusPublished

This text of AGL Constructors, a Joint Venture Arche Western Contractors, LLC, Granite Construction Company and the Lane Construction Corp. v. PTG-HDR JV, Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. and HDR Engineering, Inc. (AGL Constructors, a Joint Venture Arche Western Contractors, LLC, Granite Construction Company and the Lane Construction Corp. v. PTG-HDR JV, Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. and HDR Engineering, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
AGL Constructors, a Joint Venture Arche Western Contractors, LLC, Granite Construction Company and the Lane Construction Corp. v. PTG-HDR JV, Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. and HDR Engineering, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Vacate and Rendered and Opinion Filed July 15, 2022

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00053-CV

AGL CONSTRUCTORS, A JOINT VENTURE, ARCHER WESTERN CONTRACTORS, LLC, GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND THE LANE CONSTRUCTION CORP., Appellants V. PTG-HDR JV, PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC. AND HDR ENGINEERING, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-05165

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Reichek Opinion by Justice Osborne Before the Court is the parties’ “Joint Motion to Vacate and Render Judgment

Pursuant to Settlement.” The parties report that they have settled all matters in

controversy in this appeal, and request that we vacate the trial court’s judgment

without reference to the merits and render judgment dismissing the cause with

prejudice. Citing appellate procedure rules 42.1(a)(2)(A) and 43.2(e), the parties

request that the Court:

(a) vacate the trial court’s judgment without reference to the merits; (b) pursuant to the parties’ agreement, render judgment dismissing the cause with prejudice;

(c) order that each party bear its own costs of appeal;

(d) direct the clerk of the district court to release to Appellant’s counsel the Supersedeas Bond filed on November 8, 2019, and

(e) grant such other relief to which the parties may be entitled.

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2) addresses disposition of an

appeal in accordance with the parties’ agreement. Rough Creek Mgmt., L.L.C. v.

Weiss, No. 05-12-01333-CV, 2014 WL 3700615, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas July 24,

2014, no pet.) (mem. op.). As requested by the parties, the Court vacates the trial

court’s judgment without reference to the merits and, pursuant to the parties’

agreement, renders judgment dismissing the cause with prejudice. Also, as requested

by the parties, we order that each party bear its own costs of the appeal, and direct

the clerk of the district court to release to appellants’ counsel the supersedeas bond

filed on November 8, 2019. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A) and 43.2(e).

200053f.p05 /Leslie Osborne// LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE

–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

AGL CONSTRUCTORS, A JOINT On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial VENTURE, ARCHER WESTERN District Court, Dallas County, Texas CONTRACTORS, LLC, GRANITE Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-05165. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Opinion delivered by Justice AND THE LANE Osborne. Justices Pedersen, III and CONSTRUCTION CORP., Reichek participating. Appellants

No. 05-20-00053-CV V.

PTG-HDR JV, PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC. AND HDR ENGINEERING, INC., Appellees

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is VACATED without reference to the merits and, pursuant to the parties’ agreement, judgment is RENDERED dismissing the cause with prejudice.

It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal. We DIRECT the clerk of the district court to release to appellants’ counsel the supersedeas bond filed on November 8, 2019.

Judgment entered this 15th day of July, 2022.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
AGL Constructors, a Joint Venture Arche Western Contractors, LLC, Granite Construction Company and the Lane Construction Corp. v. PTG-HDR JV, Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. and HDR Engineering, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agl-constructors-a-joint-venture-arche-western-contractors-llc-granite-texapp-2022.