AGHEDO PIUS IYAMU v. JUN ZHENG
This text of AGHEDO PIUS IYAMU v. JUN ZHENG (AGHEDO PIUS IYAMU v. JUN ZHENG) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ July 09, 2024
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A24A1590. AGHEDO PIUS IYAMU et al v. JUN ZHENG.
This case originated as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. After an adverse ruling, defendant Aghedo Pius Iyamu appealed to the superior court, which entered a writ of possession in favor of the plaintiff. Iyamu and several non- parties then filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Because the appeal to this Court is from the decision of a superior court reviewing de novo the decision of a magistrate court, Iyamu was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Iyamu’s failure to file a discretionary application deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. The plaintiff-appellee’s motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 07/09/2024 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
AGHEDO PIUS IYAMU v. JUN ZHENG, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aghedo-pius-iyamu-v-jun-zheng-gactapp-2024.