Aghabekian v. Bayside Hills Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Aghabekian v. Bayside Hills Associates

69 A.D.2d 805, 414 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11448

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 2, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 69 A.D.2d 805 (Aghabekian v. Bayside Hills Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aghabekian v. Bayside Hills Associates, 69 A.D.2d 805, 414 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11448 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

) plaintiffs in Actions Nos. 1 and 2 from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 21, 1977, which (1) denied their motion to consolidate the actions and to dismiss the affirmative defenses in Action No. 2 and (2) granted the application of the defendant in Action No. 2 for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in that action. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, the motion of defendant in Action No. 2 for summary judgment is denied and plaintiffs’ motion is granted only to the extent of directing that Action No. 2 be consolidated for trial with Action No. 1 and is otherwise denied. The pleadings raise triable issues of fact which may be resolved only upon trial. Since the actions involve common questions of fact and are both pending before the court, consolidation is proper (see CPLR 602, subd [a]). Hopkins, J. P., Suozzi, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

) plaintiffs in Actions Nos. 1 and 2 from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 21, 1977, which (1) denied their motion to consolidate the actions and to dismiss the affirmative defenses in Action No. 2 and (2) granted the application of the defendant in Action No. 2 for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in that action. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, the motion of defendant in Action No. 2 for summary judgment is denied and plaintiffs’ motion is granted only to the extent of directing that Action No. 2 be consolidated for trial with Action No. 1 and is otherwise denied. The pleadings raise triable issues of fact which may be resolved only upon trial. Since the actions involve common questions of fact and are both pending before the court, consolidation is proper (see CPLR 602, subd [a]). Hopkins, J. P., Suozzi, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 A.D.2d 805, 414 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aghabekian-v-bayside-hills-associates-nyappdiv-1979.