AGF Marine Aviation Transport v. Laforce Shipyard, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit

AGF Marine Aviation Transport v. Laforce Shipyard, Inc.

132 F. App'x 260

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 18, 2005·No. No. 04-14577; D.C. Docket No. 02-00834-CV-CG-L·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal of the district court’s August 3, 2004 summary judgment order is proceeding pursuant to an order of this court entered on December 8, 2004.

The central question in this case is who is responsible for a fire that destroyed a recently constructed shrimp boat. We have carefully reviewed the massive briefs in this complex dispute. We find no error in the district court’s exclusion of untimely expert materials under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because there is no evidence establishing that the fire is the result of D’s Electrical Contracting, Inc.’s negligence, we hold that the district court properly granted summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal of the district court’s August 3, 2004 summary judgment order is proceeding pursuant to an order of this court entered on December 8, 2004.

The central question in this case is who is responsible for a fire that destroyed a recently constructed shrimp boat. We have carefully reviewed the massive briefs in this complex dispute. We find no error in the district court’s exclusion of untimely expert materials under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because there is no evidence establishing that the fire is the result of D’s Electrical Contracting, Inc.’s negligence, we hold that the district court properly granted summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.

AGF Marine Aviation Transport v. Laforce Shipyard, Inc., 132 F. App'x 260 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

132 F. App'x 260 (AGF Marine Aviation Transport v. Laforce Shipyard, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.