Agent 17, Inc. v. P.B. Ashley Knits, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Agent 17, Inc. v. P.B. Ashley Knits, Ltd.

282 A.D.2d 413, 722 N.Y.S.2d 740, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5037

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 2, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D.2d 413 (Agent 17, Inc. v. P.B. Ashley Knits, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Agent 17, Inc. v. P.B. Ashley Knits, Ltd., 282 A.D.2d 413, 722 N.Y.S.2d 740, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5037 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover payment for goods sold and delivered, the defendant Regent International Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), dated March 21, 2000, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it should have been granted. The appellant demonstrated its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Fourth Ocean Putnam Corp. v Interstate Wrecking Co., 66 NY2d 38, 44-45; Platt v Portnoy, 220 AD2d 652, 653). The evidence submitted by the plaintiff in opposition failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324). Friedmann, J. P., Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover payment for goods sold and delivered, the defendant Regent International Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), dated March 21, 2000, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it should have been granted. The appellant demonstrated its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Fourth Ocean Putnam Corp. v Interstate Wrecking Co., 66 NY2d 38, 44-45; Platt v Portnoy, 220 AD2d 652, 653). The evidence submitted by the plaintiff in opposition failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324). Friedmann, J. P., Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D.2d 413, 722 N.Y.S.2d 740, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agent-17-inc-v-pb-ashley-knits-ltd-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack