Agency for Health Care Administration v. Chrysalis Center, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Agency for Health Care Administration v. Chrysalis Center, Inc.

143 So. 3d 491, 2014 WL 3805749, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11917

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 1, 2014

DocketNo. 1D14-2944

StatusPublished

This text of 143 So. 3d 491 (Agency for Health Care Administration v. Chrysalis Center, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Agency for Health Care Administration v. Chrysalis Center, Inc., 143 So. 3d 491, 2014 WL 3805749, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11917 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the Court’s order of July 10, 2014, the Court has determined that the appeal is premature. Dep’t of Children & Families v. Monroe, 744 So.2d 1163, 1164 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (“the order does not set the amount of attorney’s fees and is therefore non-final and non-appealable as to attorney’s fees”); Scullin v. City of Pensacola, 667 So.2d 215, 216 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (dismissing appeal from order granting a motion for costs and fees that reserved jurisdiction to determine the amounts). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

THOMAS, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the Court’s order of July 10, 2014, the Court has determined that the appeal is premature. Dep’t of Children & Families v. Monroe, 744 So.2d 1163, 1164 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (“the order does not set the amount of attorney’s fees and is therefore non-final and non-appealable as to attorney’s fees”); Scullin v. City of Pensacola, 667 So.2d 215, 216 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (dismissing appeal from order granting a motion for costs and fees that reserved jurisdiction to determine the amounts). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

THOMAS, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 So. 3d 491, 2014 WL 3805749, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agency-for-health-care-administration-v-chrysalis-center-inc-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack