Agencias Intermares, Inc. v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.
This text of 74 F.R.D. 1 (Agencias Intermares, Inc. v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Transportation of merchandise on C & F (and CIF) terms have been interpreted to mean that once the seller delivers merchandise to the carrier for transportation, title passes to the buyer and he runs the risk of loss in transit. Thames & Mersey, etc., Ins. Co. v. United States, 327 U.S. 19, 35 S.Ct. 496, 59 L.Ed. 821 (1915). This notwithstanding stipulations to the contrary made in connection with a contract labelled CIF, S. Ramirez & Co. Inc. v. J. Gonzalez Clemente & Co., 46 P.R.R. at 503, even were we to credit plaintiff’s argument to that effect when it is, on summary judgment motion, unsupported by affidavits. 73 Am.Jur.2d, Section 23, 745. Under the circumstances, plaintiff, seller of the merchandise on the C & F contract herein involved, is not the party that can bring an action against defendant carrier, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment on grounds plaintiff is not the real party in interest, is hereby granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 F.R.D. 1, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agencias-intermares-inc-v-sea-land-service-inc-prd-1974.