Agencias Intermares, Inc. v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.

74 F.R.D. 1, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8348
CourtDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico
DecidedMay 28, 1974
DocketCiv. No. 223-71
StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.R.D. 1 (Agencias Intermares, Inc. v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Agencias Intermares, Inc. v. Sea-Land Service, Inc., 74 F.R.D. 1, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8348 (prd 1974).

Opinion

ORDER

TOLEDO, Chief Judge.

Transportation of merchandise on C & F (and CIF) terms have been interpreted to mean that once the seller delivers merchandise to the carrier for transportation, title passes to the buyer and he runs the risk of loss in transit. Thames & Mersey, etc., Ins. Co. v. United States, 327 U.S. 19, 35 S.Ct. 496, 59 L.Ed. 821 (1915). This notwithstanding stipulations to the contrary made in connection with a contract labelled CIF, S. Ramirez & Co. Inc. v. J. Gonzalez Clemente & Co., 46 P.R.R. at 503, even were we to credit plaintiff’s argument to that effect when it is, on summary judgment motion, unsupported by affidavits. 73 Am.Jur.2d, Section 23, 745. Under the circumstances, plaintiff, seller of the merchandise on the C & F contract herein involved, is not the party that can bring an action against defendant carrier, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment on grounds plaintiff is not the real party in interest, is hereby granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thames & Mersey Marine Insurance v. United States
237 U.S. 19 (Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F.R.D. 1, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agencias-intermares-inc-v-sea-land-service-inc-prd-1974.