AGATHEAS v. State

77 So. 3d 1290, 2012 WL 469735, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2270
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in AGATHEAS v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2105
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 15, 2012·No. 4D06-4870·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

DAMOORGIAN, J.

We reconsider on remand our opinion in Agatheas v. State, 28 So.3d 204 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), which was quashed by the Florida Supreme Court in Agatheas v. State, 77 So.3d 1232 (Fla.2011). Consistent with the supreme court’s holding that the admission of the 45-caliber revolver, photographs of the gun, bandana, and latex gloves found in Agatheas’s backpack, was error, we conclude that Agatheas was denied a fair trial by the cumulative effect *1291 of the admission of this irrelevant and inadmissible evidence elicited by the State. See Penalver v. State, 926 So.2d 1118, 1137 (Fla.2006) (providing that where multiple errors exists, courts must consider whether the cumulative effect of those errors deprives the defendant of a fair trial) (citing Nowitzke v. State, 572 So.2d 1346, 1350 (Fla.1990)).

Accordingly, we reverse Agatheas’s conviction and sentence and remand for a new trial.

Reversed.

MAY, C.J., and CIKLIN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AGATHEAS v. State, 77 So. 3d 1290, 2012 WL 469735, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2270 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

77 So. 3d 1290 (AGATHEAS v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Penalver v. State
926 So. 2d 1118 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
Nowitzke v. State
572 So. 2d 1346 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
AGATHEAS v. State
28 So. 3d 204 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Agatheas v. State
77 So. 3d 1232 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)