Agard v. Bryant

24 A.D.3d 182, 805 N.Y.S.2d 348
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 8, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 24 A.D.3d 182 (Agard v. Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Agard v. Bryant, 24 A.D.3d 182, 805 N.Y.S.2d 348 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Patricia Anne Williams, J.), entered September 22, 2004, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.

In moving for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, defendant was required to come forward with competent medical evidence negating plaintiffs claim that the subject accident caused her serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Defendant met this initial burden by submitting, inter alia, the sworn report of a radiologist who, based on his review of MRI films of plaintiffs left and right knees, opined that both knees were affected by degenerative processes long predating the subject accident, and that there was no evidence of any traumatic injury the accident might have caused. The sworn medical report plaintiff submitted in opposition failed to refute, or even to address, the opinion of defendant’s expert that the limitations of plaintiffs knees resulted from a preexisting degenerative condition. Since plaintiff thus failed to rebut defendant’s prima facie showing that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury as the result of the subject accident, defendant is entitled to summary judgment (see Pommells v Perez, 4 NY3d 566, 574-575, 579-580 [2005]; Montgomery v Pena, 19 AD3d 288, 290 [2005]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flores v. Bergtraum
S.D. New York, 2022
Vaughan v. Leon
94 A.D.3d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Covert v. Samuel
53 A.D.3d 1147 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Lux v. Jakson
52 A.D.3d 1253 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Ashquabe v. McConnell
14 Misc. 3d 211 (New York Supreme Court, 2006)
Carter v. Full Service, Inc.
29 A.D.3d 342 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 A.D.3d 182, 805 N.Y.S.2d 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agard-v-bryant-nyappdiv-2005.