AGAR Corporation, Inc. v. Electro Circuits International, LLC and Suresh Parikh

Court of Appeals of Texas

AGAR Corporation, Inc. v. Electro Circuits International, LLC and Suresh Parikh

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 10, 2014·No. 14-14-00229-CV·Published

Opinion

Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 10, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00229-CV

AGAR CORPORATION, INC., Appellant V. ELECTRO CIRCUITS INTERNATIONAL, LLC AND SURESH PARIKH, Appellees

On Appeal from the 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2008-20480

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an attempted appeal from an interlocutory order dismissing appellant’s claims against appellees signed December 20, 2013. On June 30, 2014, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal without prejudice to re-filing an appeal after a final judgment or other appealable order has been signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. In its motion, appellant states that it has learned that all claims for relief were not addressed in the trial court’s summary judgment order. The motion is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed without prejudice.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 10, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00229-CV

AGAR CORPORATION, INC., Appellant V. ELECTRO CIRCUITS INTERNATIONAL, LLC AND SURESH PARIKH, Appellees

On Appeal from the 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2008-20480

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an attempted appeal from an interlocutory order dismissing appellant’s claims against appellees signed December 20, 2013. On June 30, 2014, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal without prejudice to re-filing an appeal after a final judgment or other appealable order has been signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. In its motion, appellant states that it has learned that all claims for relief were not addressed in the trial court’s summary judgment order. The motion is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed without prejudice.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.

AGAR Corporation, Inc. v. Electro Circuits International, LLC and Suresh Parikh, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

AGAR Corporation, Inc. v. Electro Circuits International, LLC and Suresh Parikh (AGAR Corporation, Inc. v. Electro Circuits International, LLC and Suresh Parikh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.