AGAPITO JIMINEZ BALTAZAR v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of AGAPITO JIMINEZ BALTAZAR v. STATE OF FLORIDA (AGAPITO JIMINEZ BALTAZAR v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
AGAPITO JIMENEZ-BALTAZAR, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D19-1800
[October 24, 2019]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Joseph Marx, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502009CF002437AXXXMB.
Agapito Jimenez-Baltazar, Okeechobee, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, TAYLOR and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
AGAPITO JIMINEZ BALTAZAR v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agapito-jiminez-baltazar-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.