Agape Community v. Rose Printing Co.
779 So. 2d 638, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2496, 2001 WL 223297
This text of 779 So. 2d 638 (Agape Community v. Rose Printing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Agape Community v. Rose Printing Co., 779 So. 2d 638, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2496, 2001 WL 223297 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
Opinion
Affirmed. Whether a party has substantially performed a contract is an issue of fact. See Grant v. Wester, 679 So.2d 1301 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The trial court’s factual determination that the appellee substantially performed the contract is supported by competent substantial evidence. See Cipolato v. Cooper, 230 So.2d 687 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Grant v. Wester
679 So. 2d 1301 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Cipolato v. Cooper
230 So. 2d 687 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
779 So. 2d 638, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2496, 2001 WL 223297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agape-community-v-rose-printing-co-fladistctapp-2001.