Agape Community v. Rose Printing Co.
779 So. 2d 638, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2496, 2001 WL 223297
Opinion
Affirmed. Whether a party has substantially performed a contract is an issue of fact. See Grant v. Wester, 679 So.2d 1301 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The trial court’s factual determination that the appellee substantially performed the contract is supported by competent substantial evidence. See Cipolato v. Cooper, 230 So.2d 687 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Agape Community v. Rose Printing Co., 779 So. 2d 638, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2496, 2001 WL 223297 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
779 So. 2d 638 (Agape Community v. Rose Printing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grant v. Wester
679 So. 2d 1301 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Cipolato v. Cooper
230 So. 2d 687 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)