Agama v. State

181 So. 3d 571, 2015 WL 9487556
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 30, 2015
Docket2D13-4482
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 181 So. 3d 571 (Agama v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Agama v. State, 181 So. 3d 571, 2015 WL 9487556 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

LAMBERT F. AGAMA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D13-4482 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed December 30, 2015.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; John F. Lakin, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

ALTENBERND, Judge.

Lambert F. Agama appeals his judgments and sentences for traveling to

seduce, solicit, or entice a child to commit a sex act in violation of section

847.0135(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2012), and using a computer to seduce, solicit, or

entice a child to commit a sex act in violation of section 847.0135(3)(a). Mr. Agama

correctly argues that a conviction and sentence for both offenses violates the prohibition against double jeopardy. See Meythaler v. State, 175 So. 3d 918 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015);

see also State v. Shelley, 176 So. 3d 914 (Fla. 2015). Accordingly, we reverse the

conviction and sentence for soliciting. Although we affirm Mr. Agama's conviction for

traveling, the reversal of the conviction for soliciting substantially reduces the total

points on the sentencing scoresheet. We thus remand for the trial court to vacate Mr.

Agama's sentence for traveling and to resentence Mr. Agama on that conviction.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

SILBERMAN and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Samuel D. Straitiff v. State
228 So. 3d 1173 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
David F. Honaker v. State
199 So. 3d 1068 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Brandon Stapler v. State
190 So. 3d 162 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
State v. Agama
186 So. 3d 50 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 So. 3d 571, 2015 WL 9487556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agama-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.