A.G. v. Department of Children & Families

220 So. 3d 467, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1654
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 7, 2017·No. Case No. 5D16-3647·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See J.B.P. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 868 So.2d 1289, 1290 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (“Because the complete record is sufficient and enables us to review the final order of termination, even with only a single omnibus finding, we have elected not to reverse in this case. We caution the Judges in this District presiding over termination of parental rights cases, however, not to infer that the failure to make specific factual findings will always be harmless. In most eases-although not in this one-such findings are indispensable.”).

ORFINGER and EDWARDS, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A.G. v. Department of Children & Families, 220 So. 3d 467, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1654 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

220 So. 3d 467 (A.G. v. Department of Children & Families) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

J.B.P. v. Department of Children & Families
868 So. 2d 1289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)