AG v. Department of Children and Families
1 So. 3d 345, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2366, 2009 WL 211071
Opinion
We affirm based on the reasoning of the Fourth District in E.T. v. State, Department of Children & Families, 930 So.2d 721 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). We certify the *346 following question to the supreme court as a question of great public importance.
MAY A PARENT WHOSE PARENTAL RIGHTS HAVE BEEN TERMINATED CHALLENGE THE JUDGMENT OF TERMINATION BY PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS ON THE BASIS THAT THE PARENT WAS DENIED EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL?
AFFIRMED; QUESTION CERTIFIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
AG v. Department of Children and Families, 1 So. 3d 345, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2366, 2009 WL 211071 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
1 So. 3d 345 (AG v. Department of Children and Families) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Et v. State, Dept. of Children and Fams.
930 So. 2d 721 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)