A.G. v. DCF
This text of A.G. v. DCF (A.G. v. DCF) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
A.G., MOTHER OF H.F.D., T.D. AND M.R.G., CHILDREN,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-3647
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,
Appellee. ________________________________/
Opinion filed February 7, 2017
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Gary L. Sanders, Judge.
Ryan Thomas Truskoski, Special Assistant Regional Counsel, Jeffrey Deen, Appellate Counsel, and Lori D. Loftis, Assistant Regional Counsel, of The Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Casselberry, for Appellant.
Deborah Anne Schroth, for Appellee, Department of Children and Families.
Sara E. Goldfarb, Sanford, for Guardian ad Litem Program.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See J.B.P. v. Dep't of Children & Families, 868 So. 2d 1289, 1290
(Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (“Because the complete record is sufficient and enables us to review the final order of termination, even with only a single omnibus finding, we have elected
not to reverse in this case. We caution the Judges in this District presiding over
termination of parental rights cases, however, not to infer that the failure to make specific
factual findings will always be harmless. In most cases-although not in this one-such
findings are indispensable.”).
ORFINGER and EDWARDS, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
A.G. v. DCF, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ag-v-dcf-fladistctapp-2017.