Afzal v. Aslam

Fourth Circuit

Afzal v. Aslam

467 F. App'x 189

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 27, 2012

DocketNo. 11-1718

StatusPublished

This text of 467 F. App'x 189 (Afzal v. Aslam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Afzal v. Aslam, 467 F. App'x 189 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mohammad Afzal appeals the district court’s order dismissing his fraud claim against Malik A. Aslam. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Afzal v. Aslam, No. 1:11-cv-00395-WMN, 2011 WL 2457682 (D. Md. June 15, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Mohammad Afzal appeals the district court’s order dismissing his fraud claim against Malik A. Aslam. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Afzal v. Aslam, No. 1:11-cv-00395-WMN, 2011 WL 2457682 (D. Md. June 15, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

467 F. App'x 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/afzal-v-aslam-ca4-2012.