Afzal v. Aslam

Fourth Circuit

Afzal v. Aslam

467 F. App'x 189

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2012·No. No. 11-1718·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mohammad Afzal appeals the district court’s order dismissing his fraud claim against Malik A. Aslam. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Afzal v. Aslam, No. 1:11-cv-00395-WMN, 2011 WL 2457682 (D. Md. June 15, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Mohammad Afzal appeals the district court’s order dismissing his fraud claim against Malik A. Aslam. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Afzal v. Aslam, No. 1:11-cv-00395-WMN, 2011 WL 2457682 (D. Md. June 15, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Afzal v. Aslam, 467 F. App'x 189 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

467 F. App'x 189 (Afzal v. Aslam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.