AFSCME MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 v. City of Detroit
712 N.W.2d 727, 474 Mich. 1133
This text of 712 N.W.2d 727 (AFSCME MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 v. City of Detroit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
AFSCME MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 v. City of Detroit, 712 N.W.2d 727, 474 Mich. 1133 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ("AFSCME") MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25, AFSCME Local 214, AFSCME Local 312, and Leamon Wilson, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CITY OF DETROIT, Mayor of the City of Detroit, Wayne County Executive, Macomb County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Oakland County Executive, Regional Transit Coordinating Council, and Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 5, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
712 N.W.2d 727, 474 Mich. 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/afscme-michigan-council-25-v-city-of-detroit-mich-2006.