AFSCME COUNCIL 25, AFSCME LOCAL 41 v. City of Highland Park
718 N.W.2d 363, 476 Mich. 860
This text of 718 N.W.2d 363 (AFSCME COUNCIL 25, AFSCME LOCAL 41 v. City of Highland Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
AFSCME COUNCIL 25, AFSCME LOCAL 41 v. City of Highland Park, 718 N.W.2d 363, 476 Mich. 860 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
AFSCME COUNCIL 25, AFSCME Local 41, and James Fuller, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and
Annierly Cooper and Sadie Adams, Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
718 N.W.2d 363, 476 Mich. 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/afscme-council-25-afscme-local-41-v-city-of-highla-mich-2006.