Afram v. United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ) JOSEPH D. AFRAM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12-1389 (RWR) ) UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL ) WORKERS UNIONS AND ) PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS ) HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________)
MEMORANDUM ORDER
The defendants have moved for an award of attorneys’ fees
and expenses following dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint.
Magistrate Judge Alan Kay issued a Report and Recommendation
recommending that the defendants’ motion be denied. The Report
and Recommendation warned that failure to file objections to it
within 10 days could waive the right to appeal any order of the
District Court adopting the recommendations. No objections to
the Report and Recommendation have been received, and all
objections are deemed waived. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140,
150 (1985); Anyanwutaku v. Wilson, Civil Action No. 00-2296
(CKK), 2005 WL 774854, at *1 (D.D.C. Apr. 5, 2005). Furthermore,
Magistrate Judge Kay’s Report and Recommendation [32] is adopted
in full. Accordingly, it is hereby - 2 -
ORDERED that the defendants’ motion [22] for attorneys’ fees
be, and hereby is, DENIED.
SIGNED this 18th day of February, 2014.
/s/ RICHARD W. ROBERTS Chief Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Afram v. United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund (Afram v. United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.