Afl-Cio & California Labor v. Camber of Commerce

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 8, 2006
Docket03-55166
StatusPublished

This text of Afl-Cio & California Labor v. Camber of Commerce (Afl-Cio & California Labor v. Camber of Commerce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Afl-Cio & California Labor v. Camber of Commerce, (9th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE  UNITED STATES; CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE; EMPLOYERS GROUP; CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATION; CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS AND TECHNOLOGY ASSN.; CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH FACILITIES; CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF HOME & SERVICES FOR THE AGING; BETTEC CORPORATION; MARKSHERM CORPORATION; ZILACO INC., ZILACO; No. 03-55166 DEL RIO HEALTHCARE, INC.;  D.C. No. BEVERLY HEALTH & REHABILITATION CV-02-00377-GLT SERVICES, INC. Dba Beverly Manor Costa Mesa; INTERNEXT GROUP, Plaintiffs-Appellees, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS; CALIFORNIA LABOR FEDERATION, AFL-CIO, Intervenors-Appellants, v. 

1531 1532 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE v. LOCKYER

BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General,  in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of California; DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES; FRANK G. VANACORE, as the Chief of the Audit Review and Analysis Section of the California  Department of Health Services; DIANA M. BONTA, Diana M. Bonta, R.N., Dr., P.h.D, as the Director of the California Department of Health Services, Defendants. 

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE  UNITED STATES; CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE; EMPLOYERS GROUP; CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATION; CALIFORNIA No. 03-55169 MANUFACTURERS AND TECHNOLOGY ASSN.; CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF  D.C. No. CV-02-00377-GLT HEALTH FACILITIES; CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF HOME & ORDER SERVICES FOR THE AGING; BETTEC CORPORATION; MARKSHERM CORPORATION; ZILACO INC., ZILACO; DEL RIO HEALTHCARE, INC.;  CHAMBER OF COMMERCE v. LOCKYER 1533

BEVERLY HEALTH & REHABILITATION  SERVICES, INC. Dba Beverly Manor Costa Mesa; INTERNEXT GROUP, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS; CALIFORNIA LABOR FEDERATION, AFL-CIO, Intervenors, v. BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General,  in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of California; DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES; FRANK G. VANACORE, as the Chief of the Audit Review and Analysis) Section of the California Department of Health Services; DIANA M. BONTA, Diana M. Bonta, R.N., Dr., P.h.D, as the Director of the California Department of Health Services, Defendants-Appellants.  Filed February 9, 2006

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge. 1534 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE v. LOCKYER ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of the en banc court, the opin- ion and dissent filed on September 6, 2005, slip op. 12167, and appearing at 422 F.3d 973 (9th Cir. 2005), are withdrawn. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Lockyer
422 F.3d 973 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Afl-Cio & California Labor v. Camber of Commerce, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/afl-cio-california-labor-v-camber-of-commerce-ca9-2006.