Afiademanyo v. Gonzales

Fourth Circuit

Afiademanyo v. Gonzales

204 F. App'x 217

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 6, 2006·No. No. 06-1210·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Yawovi Afiademanyo, a native and citizen of Togo, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse [218]*218its discretion in denying Afiademanyo’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b) (2006).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Afiademanyo, No. A95-900-314 (B.I.A. Jan. 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Yawovi Afiademanyo, a native and citizen of Togo, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse [218]*218its discretion in denying Afiademanyo’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b) (2006).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Afiademanyo, No. A95-900-314 (B.I.A. Jan. 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Afiademanyo v. Gonzales, 204 F. App'x 217 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

204 F. App'x 217 (Afiademanyo v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related