Afghani v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority

45 A.D.3d 511, 845 N.Y.S.2d 131
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 7, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 45 A.D.3d 511 (Afghani v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Afghani v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority, 45 A.D.3d 511, 845 N.Y.S.2d 131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), dated July 7, [512]*5122006, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by providing sufficient evidence that the infant decedent darted out from behind parked vehicles, directly into the path of the defendants’ vehicle, leaving the defendant driver unable to avoid contact (see Sheppeard v Murci, 306 AD2d 268, 269 [2003]). In opposition, the affidavit of Mahmood Afghani, the uncle of the infant decedent, sworn to almost five years after the accident, in which he indicated for the first time and contrary to the plaintiff’s deposition testimony, that he had witnessed the subject accident, presented a feigned issue of fact as to whether the accident was proximately caused by the driver’s negligence (see Gomez v Rodriguez, 31 AD3d 497, 498 [2006]). Moreover, under these circumstances, where the plaintiff failed to make some showing of negligence on the part of the defendants, the plaintiff was not entitled to invoke the Noseworthy doctrine (see Noseworthy v City of New York, 298 NY 76 [1948]; Williams v Econ, 221 AD2d 429 [1995]). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arango v. Sandhaus
203 A.D.3d 1002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Rosner v. Srulovic
201 A.D.3d 980 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Wemyss v. Ruszczyk
126 A.D.3d 888 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Clark v. Amboy Bus Co.
117 A.D.3d 892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
GREEN, ANGELA D. v. HOSLEY, CATHERINE M.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Green v. Hosley
117 A.D.3d 1437 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Perez v. City of New York
104 A.D.3d 661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Jahangir v. Logan Bus Co.
89 A.D.3d 1064 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Yavkina v. New York City Police Department
84 A.D.3d 791 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Brown v. Muniz
61 A.D.3d 526 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 A.D.3d 511, 845 N.Y.S.2d 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/afghani-v-metropolitan-suburban-bus-authority-nyappdiv-2007.