Afghani v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Afghani v. City of New York

227 A.D.2d 305, 643 N.Y.S.2d 333

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 21, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 227 A.D.2d 305 (Afghani v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Afghani v. City of New York, 227 A.D.2d 305, 643 N.Y.S.2d 333 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce McM. Wright, J., and a jury), entered February 21, 1995, in favor of defendant and against plaintiffs, dismissing the action, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered October 13, 1994, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the verdict, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We find no violation of CPLR 4110-b, and, even if there were, no resulting prejudice requiring reversal. It does not appear that plaintiffs were prevented from arguing the case effectively and intelligently by the claimed failure to conduct a precharge conference, or that they requested permission to reopen their summation after the charge (see, Altman v Deepdale Gen. Hosp., 124 AD2d 768, 769, lv denied 70 NY2d 611, citing Getlin v St. Vincent’s Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 117 AD2d 707, 708; Spadaccini v Dolan, 63 AD2d 110, 122). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce McM. Wright, J., and a jury), entered February 21, 1995, in favor of defendant and against plaintiffs, dismissing the action, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered October 13, 1994, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the verdict, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We find no violation of CPLR 4110-b, and, even if there were, no resulting prejudice requiring reversal. It does not appear that plaintiffs were prevented from arguing the case effectively and intelligently by the claimed failure to conduct a precharge conference, or that they requested permission to reopen their summation after the charge (see, Altman v Deepdale Gen. Hosp., 124 AD2d 768, 769, lv denied 70 NY2d 611, citing Getlin v St. Vincent’s Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 117 AD2d 707, 708; Spadaccini v Dolan, 63 AD2d 110, 122). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 A.D.2d 305, 643 N.Y.S.2d 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/afghani-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack